Continuum vs Jupiter Perps: Synthetics vs Perpetuals
Understanding the difference between synthetic tokens and perpetual futures
A comparison of Continuum synthetic tokens and Jupiter perpetual futures for leveraged trading on Solana.
Continuum
SolanaSynthetic Token Protocol
Pros
- No funding rates or holding costs
- Tokens work across all Solana DeFi
- Transfer positions between wallets
- No liquidation without leverage
Cons
- Leverage requires external protocols
- Full collateralization for minting
- Need to manage two token types (L/S)
Jupiter Perps
SolanaPerpetual Futures Protocol
Pros
- Very high leverage available
- Capital efficient for short-term trades
- Deep liquidity on major pairs
- Familiar interface for futures traders
Cons
- Funding rates can be expensive
- Positions not transferable or composable
- Constant liquidation risk
Our Verdict
Continuum is better for longer-term positions, DeFi integration, and strategies requiring composable tokens. Jupiter Perps excels at short-term leveraged speculation with capital efficiency.
Which Should You Use?
Scalping / Day Trading
Jupiter PerpsHigh leverage and capital efficiency for short-term trades
Swing Trading (days to weeks)
ContinuumNo funding rates eating into profits over time
Long-term exposure
ContinuumHold indefinitely without accumulating funding costs
Collateral for other protocols
ContinuumL/S tokens can be used as collateral across Solana DeFi
Maximum leverage trading
Jupiter PerpsNative support for up to 100x leverage
More Comparisons
Continuum vs Synthetix: Solana vs Ethereum Synthetics
Comparing the leading synthetic asset protocols across chains
Continuum vs GMX: Cross-Chain Synthetic Comparison
Comparing Solana and Arbitrum approaches to synthetic trading
Synthetic Assets vs Wrapped Tokens: What's the Difference?
Understanding two approaches to bringing assets on-chain
Try Continuum Today
See why traders are choosing Continuum for synthetic asset trading on Solana.
Get Early Access