Continuum vs GMX: Cross-Chain Synthetic Comparison
Comparing Solana and Arbitrum approaches to synthetic trading
How Continuum on Solana compares to GMX on Arbitrum for synthetic and leveraged trading.
Continuum
SolanaPaired L/S Token Protocol
Pros
- Fastest L1 chain for trading
- Near-zero transaction costs
- No funding or borrowing fees
- Tokens composable across DeFi
Cons
- Solana ecosystem only
- Newer protocol
- Smaller initial liquidity
GMX
Arbitrum / AvalanchePerpetual DEX with GLP
Pros
- Battle-tested since 2021
- Deep GLP liquidity pool
- Zero price impact trades
- Multi-chain deployment
Cons
- Borrow fees add up over time
- Positions not transferable
- GLP holders take counterparty risk
Our Verdict
Continuum offers superior speed, costs, and composability on Solana. GMX provides battle-tested infrastructure with deeper liquidity for traders preferring EVM chains.
Which Should You Use?
Solana-native DeFi users
ContinuumNative to your ecosystem with full composability
EVM chain preference
GMXAvailable on Arbitrum and Avalanche
Large position sizes
GMXDeeper GLP liquidity pool for minimal slippage
Cost-sensitive trading
ContinuumLower fees with no borrow costs
Yield on liquidity
GMXGLP earns trading fees and rewards
More Comparisons
Continuum vs Synthetix: Solana vs Ethereum Synthetics
Comparing the leading synthetic asset protocols across chains
Continuum vs Jupiter Perps: Synthetics vs Perpetuals
Understanding the difference between synthetic tokens and perpetual futures
Synthetic Assets vs Wrapped Tokens: What's the Difference?
Understanding two approaches to bringing assets on-chain
Try Continuum Today
See why traders are choosing Continuum for synthetic asset trading on Solana.
Get Early Access